There is just too much evidence now that suggests an inside job: the fact that all THE WRECKAGE WAS SHIPPED ABROAD as soon as possible, the fact that even ROLLS ROYCE themselves have said that the engine recovered were not the type of engine used on the type of plane (b757) that was said to be responsible. The fact that most of the 'hijackers' are still alive: http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLE... the fact that no jets were scrambled in time; that no significant plane debris was found at the pentagon site (planes do not vaporize!); that the buildings seem to be demolished, especially building 7; that jet fuel cannot melt steel, even though molten steel was seen "flowing like lava"; that the first responders heard explosions in the basement and within the buildings before they collapsed etc...
-WTC leaseholder Larry Silverstein admitted that building 7 was pulled down by a controlled demolition:
"Seems controlled" isn't the same as "must have been controlled demolition". I would argue your perceptions are wrong because when I look at the World Trade Center collapses I see nothing at all controlled about them. The people who designed and build tall buildings and do physics for a living ALL say the Towers collapse was inevitable under the circumstances. The people who say otherwise either don't know what they are talking about or deliberately fudge their numbers to promote some BS political agenda.
If you believe terrorists with a long history of attacking America and American interests radicalized 19 young men, then taught them the minimum they needed to know about hijacking commercial airliners and flying them into symbols of American economic, military and political power to achieve their political goals then you have a very strong case. The plan is dead simple, quite cheap, requires few conspirators and not an enormous amount of special skill. The more complex a plan is, the more people are involved and the greater the risk of something going wrong, someone stumbling upon the plan or someone spilling the beans. All of the inside job plans are inherently enormously complicated and require huge numbers of conspirators - into the thousands or tens of thousands at least - and I don't think the people who push them know that.
If you believe the World Trade Center was destroyed by pre-planted explosives in a controlled demolition you have to explain how the charges got there - thousands of them. You have to explain how no one noticed any of this activity even though the prep for an explosive demo of a steel frame building is a highly invasive, destructive and visible process. You have to explain how the explosives survived the impacts, how they lasted through an hour or more of raging fires, why there was no flash, blast and bang like you always find in a CD and quite frankly, why anyone would wait an hour or more to push the plunger to begin with. Then you have to explain why not a single hint of physical evidence has been found for explosives in the intervening 12 years. Heck, you have to explain why it was necessary to demo the towers at all! As you alluded to yourself, what possible purpose does this serve the plot?
Nobody has ever even tried to explain all that. What they do instead is start with a belief that "it looked like CD" leading straight to the conclusion of "it must be CD" but making no attempt to explain the how or why.
There are some folks who wonder about whether the twin towers were targeted by terrorists. Naturally, they were unable to see the jets slamming into the buildings. These people carry white canes with red tips. Some of these people hang on to straps attached to dogs, You see, these people were NEVER able to see the film footage showing the jets slamming into the twin towers. These people are quite blind. And, the few others simply refuse to believe what there eyes are looking at. Those people are even MORE blind than the people who can't see.
It was an act of terror, so it was committed by terrorists. However, anyone who has seen an old casino in Las Vegas go down can tell that these buildings were imploded. I know we have not been told the truth, and probably never will.
Anyone with a brain in his or her head knows that 19 al Qaeda terrorists
were aboard those four airliners that day.
To believe otherwise, you need to be a conspiracy theorist.
They are all people with dreadful inferiority complexes, who are afraid that
they are just not making it in the world. They try to prove that they are just
as good as anyone else by claiming to have special knowledge, that only
a few people possess.
They are the same people who believe in E.T's and U.F.O's.
Ignore them.
Well I do, just not these so-called jihadists that they want us to believe. American terrorists are to blame for the loss of lives of their fellow citizens. What did the US gain you ask?
Well barely a month after the Towers fell "Operation Enduring Freedom" was underway which was basically the invasion of Afghanistan (opium) and a week after that the Patriot Act was passed as law, since when did you only need 5 weeks to draft a bill that curtails peoples freedoms and human rights & get it through the Senate? In 2003 they invaded Iraq (oil) and were again using this 9/11 thing as legitimacy for it, now all of their bases in Iraq are on the pipeline as that's all the US Administration are really interested in.
So those are the main reasons the USA killed 3,000 off her citizens 12 years ago, opium, oil and the abolishment of laws that protect people's freedoms and liberty.
Edit: You thumb me down but in your hearts you all know I'm right. Wake up people
Just about everyone, unless you think all 4 hijacked planes and those aboard were disappeared. In which case we have big problems.
The destruction of the two buildings seemed VERY controlled and some people say that it was literately impossible for that to happen under those circumstances? . . what do you think?
What does the U.S. have to gain from this?
