war is pretty immature when you could just talk.
Here's the pro's and con's of the US bombing Syria
Pro's
- It would potentially give the rebels a turn in the civil war
- It could make the war end quicker and save more life's
Con's
- The US would be making a very controversial move , and would be blasted by leaders of other country's
- The Western Relationship with Russia would also dwindle.
- We could be doing more harm then good , event's like attacking Syria could cause a chain re-action in the world.
So really , in my opinion , unless they directly attack us , we should just sit back and let them deal with it themselves , we're not the leader's of the world , nor are we the police and for some reason we keep forgetting that.
This generation is now doomed. Barack Obama wants to go nuclear on 9-11-13
Every ally of the USA from WW2 is totally against the USA now. Vichy France is NAZI.
The UK is Totally against this crazy war started by Vietnam war criminal John Kerry.
Barack Obama is totally MAD and will be your last commander in chief. No winners.
The war to recolonise Syria for France is mainly against Kurdish women and children.
http://en.shiapost.com/2013/08/06/milita...
The USA has clearly not thought this through at all. Only France is pushing for war
and the USA is supporting Vichy France which was our common enemy in WW2
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vichy_Franc...
Just like the Vietnam war this is a big mistake for the United States and freedom:
http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/09/02/a...
The USA should retreat immediately or prepare for total obliteration:
http://www.worldwar3news.com/
There is a better alternative which is World Peace:
www.ukok.de.tl
Please stop the USA war against women and children.
first of all , the UN security council has made no decision to attack Syria due to lack of evidence of Assad's regime's participation in the chemical attack . so any military action by any country will be illegal and will provoke countries like Iran and Russia . secondly Iran was also a victim of chemical attack during Iran-Iraq war but the USA never showed an interest in the issue and tried not to intervene . but now why are they trying to attack Syria ? i wander if it is for human rights . thirdly , among the rebels terrorists organizations like Al-queda which is a threat to the security of the world and supposedly to the united states and any military action on Syria regime will strengthen these terrorist groups in the middle east . and the bottom line is why the USA is fighting against Al-queda in Afghanistan and supplying weapons to them in Syria . it doesn't seem sincere . its fishy , isn't it ?
The entire thing hinges on the solidity of the intelligence. If the Assad regime really did use chemical weapons, there's a need for a military response. Allowing such things only leads to more trouble, and Damascus hardly needs to be encouraged in its bad behavior.
Can you give me reasons why the USA SHOULD and SHOULD NOT bomb Syria? I want to know more about how this would help them, but at the same time be useless. Be simple please,I'm not that good with topics like this.
