I have my doubts....here is why. She said that she didn't know her mom and brother were killed until the police told her, but also said she wishes she could have done more to help them. How could she have helped if she didn't know. Also, the texts and letters shared between the two before she was "kidnapped". Her taking to social media to talk about it after hearing of her brother and mom dying is not normal either. Shows no remorse for someone that "wishes she could have done more".

Hannah Anderson is NOT a victim she is guilty of involvement on some level including possibly having participated in killing her Mother and little Brother. SDSD made up evidence in the Crowe case and to make up for that they are ignoring evidence in this clear case of murder. Hannah you are gross.

this is just a opinion.I think he was having a affair with both mom and daughter.Mom found out about the daughter and went off on him.He killed her a defensive action.The son saw what happened and attacked him.He then took the kids life.he burned the house And went to get Hannah.I think he explain to her what he had done.And since it couldn't be undone she hung with him.But when they was doing the Russian roulette thing she had a loaded gun in her hands she could of shot him.As to how guilty I don't know but guilty YES

13 Texts or phone calls exchanged between them and made the same day of the murders. Also the police found letters from her to him. Went on trips with him (alone) and she couldn`t stand him. I would like to know what were in those texts and letters. It all spells Guilty with a capital G.

In my opinion, Hannah Anderson is a victim and not guilty of anything. The police are assuring us of her innocence because there are quite a few people questioning her on this awful and tragic situation. A judge has nothing to do with this because her abductor (DiMaggio) is dead therefore no case will be going to a jury.

Well her being guilty or innocent is not the issue right now.

She did whatever she had to in order to walk away with her life

think about this is a minor child under the spell of a 40 year old man

called "Uncle Jim" all along his interest was to get at her from a personal

point of view and he did what he had to do to imprison her mentally and

physically. This case will not go to trial because the accused is deceased

and it's a closed case, it will never be known what is the real deal and it

should be left alone for Hannah's immediate family to get into that affair.

Whether she is guilty or not she is safe from death. That is all that

should matter there is enough grief for that family to handle and it's

a long road to recovery from that tragedy when you lose your parent and

sibling it's not easy to get into anything else. They got closure to that evil

in their life. Praise God. I am just happy for her that she is safe.

the way she acts looks fishy. she laughed and smiled her tears were fake. you know she was sleeping with that guy and most likely took part with the murders. her story made no sense at all. she even left the funeral with some guy smiling and laughing while her father went to bury his family. and that same day she was parting!!! i dont trust that b!tch at all nor her story. she is lying.

The whole scenario is weird. The girl goes on two holidays with her 'uncle' whom she felt uncomfortable with. There are more questions than answers here.

She is not guilty until the News Media says so.

Police choose to use the media for their benefit but also may choose to say nothing while they are investigating.

I think she is very much responsible for her mother and brother's deaths and that she is not as smart as she thinks she is - habitual liars often say too much and the way she behaves tells us much more than the wat she says.

Do you believe she's guilty? I have been following her story and have my doubts on Hannah

If you would like you can share your theory and opinions

Thanks!

Also, why are the police assuring us shes innocent? Isnt that the judge's job?

I think she is guilty but she will get away with murder.

Well, she managed to turn up to collect money...

http://news.sky.com/story/1129454/hannah...

You might be right....but we are limited to that which we can prove.....only two people know for sure and one is dead.....she claims she was abducted and did not know about the murder and fire..... and unless there is PROOF to the contrary..... that is the reality

I think she is too hooked up and the police don't want to get on her wrong side.

I don't think she is guilty. She would have to be sociopath to stay with a man who she knew had killed her mother and brother and there is no evidence of that.

I say she is a victim.