1. 

" I just watched a film about it and according to them, thermite was used to bring down the buildings"

Yes, because who better to make scientific conclusions than a bunch of armchair conspiracy nuts who have never even been to Ground Zero, let alone actually have any hard evidence to back up their claims.

"also talked about building 7"

Yes building 7 is totally suspicious isn't it? I mean, a building gets hit by thousands of tons of flaming debris from a nearby building, and it collapses? Oh...did they not tell you about the fact that the building had been buried by tons of debris and was on fire?

"also there was no evidence proving a plane actually hit the Pentagon"

That's right. All those bits of aircraft they pulled from the scene, plus all the bits of bodies matching the passengers on the plane totally prove that a plane did not hit the Pentagon.

"we have a right to know "

Yes, we do. That's why the 9/11 report, detailing the most extensive criminal investigation in human history, is available online, for free. But if you'd rather believe some idiot wearing tinfoil on his head and living in his mother's basement...well...

You don't need us. You can figure this out on your own. Ask yourself:

Does it make sense for the American government to stage an attack on itself and blame that attack on Saudi's and Yemeni's (American allies) operating out of Afghanistan as an excuse to invade Iraq? If you were planning such a mammoth and complex operation with that goal don't you think you would try to make it so it could be blamed on Iraq? And why bother anyway since there was already broad support in the U.S. for military action against Iraq in the summer of 2001?

Can thermite bring down a large steel framed structure? Has it been done before? Was it successful? How much would you need to use? How would you get it in the building and plant it without anyone noticing? How would the thermite survive more than an hour of raging fires without igniting prematurely? Heck, why even bother? What purpose does it serve the plot to bring the towers down? It adds an immense amount of risk, cost and complication but certainly is not necessary to justify a war in Iraq. Simply crashing the planes would do that just fine. So does it make more sense that thousands of people snuck hundreds, perhaps thousands of tons of thermite into two of the most secure buildings in the world, built a box around each column (hundreds) the size of a PODS container, filled it with 750 pounds of thermite (the minimum necessary to do the job BTW) without getting seen or caught for NO PLAUSIBLE REASON, or is it more probably an aircraft crashing with the energy of a 2,000 pound bunker-busting bomb caused enough damage and fires to weaken the building until it could no longer stand?

Was 7 World Trade Center undamaged? Photographs and testimony from rescue workers who were there in the building show conclusively it suffered massive physical damage from the collapse of the North Tower including a 20-story gash on the south face of the building and that by early afternoon the building was fully involved in fire, was creaking and moaning, a bulge had started to develop on one side of the building and it was starting to lean.

Does that sound like an undamaged building to you? Or does that sound like ALL of the signs that tell a firefighter that a building is in imminent danger of collapse?

And even if the collapse of 7 did look just like a controlled demolition (it doesn't actually - not even close) why didn't it SOUND like one? In fact, why do people who try to claim it was a controlled demolition always mute the audio when they show a video of the collapse? Why do they edit out the first 20 seconds of the collapse when the interior and east mechanical penthouse collapsed? Why do they time the collapse only down to the 20th floor, ignoring everything that happened after that? Why are these people being dishonest and manipulating the evidence? What are they trying to pull?

If there is no evidence a plane hit the Pentagon then how was Flight 77 tracked on 6 different radar stations from take-off to impact? Why was the Flight Data Recorder from 77 recovered in the Pentagon and why does its data exactly match the radar tracks? Why did 136 witnesses go on record as seeing Flight 77 hit the Pentagon with zero witnesses on record as seeing anything else? Why was substantial amounts of wreckage from Flight 77 recovered at the Pentagon site (go ahead, Google "flight 77 debirs) and confirmed by the airline and its insurers as coming from Flight 77? Why was the DNA of every single person aboard Flight 77 recovered from the crash site? Why were some passengers bodies recovered inside the building still strapped in their seats? Heck, if it wasn't Flight 77 where did the plane and the people on board go? You said there was no evidence. That seems like an awful lot of hard evidence. I can make a prima facie case that would win in any court for Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon. Can you say the same for "just an explosion"?

Why do you think 9/11 was perpetrated by cavemen? Most of them were college educated (Atta was an engineer) and raised in Europe. 3 of the hijackers had commercial pilots licences and another was a licenced private pilot. Does that sound like a bunch of cavemen to you?

If it seems to you that everything the media and the government tells you is a lie how do you feel about the people who have been peddling you all this very obvious BS about thermite and no plane at the Pentagon, all of which is clearly not true?

Bush family and Bin Laden family are both royalty in their respective worlds, and friends/allies. I think the reason 9/11 sometimes looks like a conspiracy is because the Bushes saw to it that the Bin Laden family in the US was given a chaperone out of the country and generally kid-gloved by the government. This is enough to plant seeds of conspiracy theory which will never go away. Never.

But I think foreigners did it. Not US citizens.

Hi,

I downloaded Falling Block Game for free here: http://bitly.com/1pnRJ1Y

it's a perfectly working link!

The special effects of this game will surely stand out from similar games and the improved its sound effects.

For me, it's the best game ever.

This bit of nonsense has been asked so many times the asker could easy have looked up previous answers.

NO. It was not a hoax. Yes it really did happen.I saw it happen on the TV.

America and Britain invaded Iraq for quite unrelated reasons. It would have been invaded what ever. No connection to 9/11.

A collapsing building would be impossible to hide from the general public. Thousands of people would have to know and be silent about it. That is where most conspiracy theories collapse under their own weight. It is literally impossible to keep thousands of people quiet over years or decades and yet that is what most conspiracy theories rely on. As such, they are resting on a foundation of sand.

Probably depends on the"source" of information.

Over the years I've lost faith in "official reports" relating to governments and politicians. Whether true or not, politics is a dirty business, in my opinion. I'm ALWAYS skeptical.

If you want to research your question properly you should start with some research into the 1993 World Trade Centre Bombing.

People will believe what they want to believe. Fortunately, that sentiment works both ways. In a court of law the ‘conspiracy theorists’ are called the defence and the prosecution. We live in ‘democratic’ corpocracies. Any discussion or debate about actions of, or questioning of, is banned, ridiculed and censored in any self serving copocracy worth it’s salt.

Doing some research, I found out some stuff I didn’t know about before. The FBI knew about the plot of the World Trade Centre Bombing in 1993. They had an informer by the name of Emad Ali Salem who had told them that there was a plot to blow up one of the World Trade Centre towers and have it collapse into the other one. The informer didn’t want the bombing to go ahead and he wanted the FBI to switch or tamper with the explosives so that the bomb wouldn’t go off. They had arguments but the FBI point blank refused. Now the informer didn’t want to get implicated so he secretly taped some of his conversations with the FBI. His lawyers subsequently produced these tapes at his trial.

US TV NEWS report about 1993 WTC bombing FBI Foreknowledge Informer tapes evidence presented in court case. 28th Oct 1993