You are absolutely right for the wrong reasons. It is obvious, from your statement, that you have no idea about how the towers were designed and built. The reason the towers came down in a controlled manner is not because of some far felted government conspiracy. It was because of the design of the buildings. The way they fell is the only way they could have fell. The structures were a bunch of square building blocks stacked one top of each other tied together in the middle. Once the above floor's support beams gave away the building had to fall straight down. And with all that weight falling the outer support standards,which were tied together in the middle, could not support the sudden exposure of the massive kinetic energy placed upon them. They had no other way to fall but pancake style, one right on top of the other until the energy reached the ground. Then all that energy, free from the inner support beams, spread out in all directions until the energy from the fall dissipated.

The Twin Towers collapses in no way resemble a controlled demolition. The collapses of those towers don't even resemble each other as they collapsed in different ways.

WTC 5 was a 9-story building that was also destroyed but it looked NOTHING like the towers.

http://www.pbs.org/americarebuilds/engin...

There is a rumour that Attila the Hun was poisoned too, but that has not been proved either and is no more likely too be than your hypothesis.

it looks like the twin towers came down controlled

(ya da ya da etc..)but my question is wtc5 looked the same

why didnt the nwo send a plane into it as well

without making it look so obvious

and who benifited from all this?