Sometimes I'm glad that I don't subscribe to cable TV at all, so I don't even have to worry that the channel is even going to pollute my living room with their leftist liberal soft-core progressive commie anti-white racist dialogue from demagogues like big Al and his pompodour.
I used to see too much of his fat lard butt on regular news shows whenever anything came up about a black supposedly being abused by the system.
ie; Tawana Brawley do you remember that waste of news time back in the late 80ies. "I been manipsulated by the pow-lice (and Big Al vouched for her 150% like the big dope his still is).
In my ever so humble opinion.
Didn't go in to see link you offer, and don't know how illiterate he might be, but if we all stand back just a tiny bit and use our brains instead of our emotions, we will see that it is perfectly normal that any and all "minority" groups in the U.S. have as many members of their community to represent them as they possibly can. I myself don't believe much in the word "minority", for it seems that neither blacks, nor Hispanics are minorities any longer, as where numbers of people is concerned. And, unless extremely, extremely mistaken Anglos will indeed be a minority much sooner than the projected next 50 years that "professionals" point out.
I personally would have stopped calling blacks (I refer to African-Americans, as opposed to the hundreds of thousands of new arrivals of Cubans, Haitians, Dominicans, other Caribbean, Somalis, Nigerians, South Africans, Namibians, etc.), simply because black Americans are simply Americans. I, of course do not distinguish color and races that much, and my favorite subject is politics. So as long as someone is interested in politics or interested in bringing some change or good to the country--unless those changes are considerably huge--I am all for it. If I didn't have this line of thinking, I should have left the U.S. long time ago!
As for Sharpton: Since I don't watch TV anymore I wouldn't know what he is up to. To me he is a somewhat likable guy, probably because he is so politically active.
But on a more serious note, and just to illustrate my point about how the only important thing in U.S. government (and any government) is political activism, I will tell you that more than 25 years ago I clearly heard the news on Spanish radio which explained that a group of black American activists had visited Cuba in order to obtain huge quantities of a common rodent pest control. This was in order to use it in (none other) than the greatest city in the world: New York City. Why? Because most of the blacks and Puerto Ricans there could not take the rats and mice anymore!!!
Don't know if you know this more recent situation, in which Venezuela's socialist (and rumored Communist) President Hugo Chavez sent free or extremely low gas to the Bronx in order to help the poor there. This was probably due to fact that actors Sean Penn and Danny Glover are close friends of his, and as most people know Danny Glover complains of "racism" done to him and to his daughter in other parts of New York. And as for Sean, everyone knows he is one to look out for the poor and downtrodden.
So, really, what bad is there in Al Sharpton doing something for his own people, whether on MSNBC or anywhere else?
I think MSNBC and Sharpton are made for each other.
Yes they can but not tomuch farther
they still can hire Blagoavich
I guess you could say MSNBC is committed to giving their viewers their daily trash.
Don't fool yourself, Fox News is in an equal level.
