Well he maintains he didn't so that's what prosecutors are trying to work out. I remember when it first came out there was all this stuff about how he was gay and didn't want to marry her but was pushed into it. That doesn't mean it's true, it was just paper speculation and the claims of a man who did actually kill her but if he did set it up I guess we'll know soon, if he did, now that he's actually going to trial.
Personally, I think he is as guilty as hell, particularly in view of the CCTV film of him meeting the taxi driver two days after the killing. He claims he was paying for the trip. That's just too stupid to believe! Who pays a taxi driver in whose cab his wife was killed? Are we to suppose he gave him the customary tip as well? On every level, his story sucks! His motives are unknown at this time, and his family saying that he wants to go back, but is not well enough to do so, is simply stalling. His lawyers a making a fortune and they will spin this out for as long as it takes. But then his family can afford it. If it was up to me, I have him on a plane to SA so fast his head would spin. He is using the legal system, and abusing it with his pretence of PTSD.
that's up too the south africans to find out.. about the nut case act, didn't work for hess, in fact he went mad trying to make himself mad as a gimmick..
Oh wow the trial has already taken place? I missed it, what was he convicted of?
why did he get her killed what was the reason?
