I wrote an article on it where I walk you through the whole thing with all the who what when where and most importantly the WHY. I also wrote it under my pseudonym "Bloatedtoad". Read that here:
http://www.dailypaul.com/280404/its-time...
I do not think it was a conspiracy do to the fact that everyone of the planes was flown or taken over by the people of that country, i feel like if the USA would tightened the belt on who can come here to the USA and get a pilots flyin permits that they should have to be actually born and raised here in the USA,,and no i do not think it is discrimination for us to do so for it is all about keeping america safe,,i do believe however that the war with iraq was a conspiracy do to the facts i read about it,,i dont think that we should have gone to the extremes that we went yes i do think that the leader there should have been taken out by their own peeps and yes with our help if so asked to do so,,,for the facts i read that was just wrong to me,,and i do not think it should have taken the USA that long to find osama bin laden that kind makes this whole thing seem kinda fishy as well
It wasn't a US government conspiracy.
Folks who think it is suffer from paranoid delusions and have no basic understanding of physics or engineering.
The towers fell straight down (more or less) because of how they were constructed. The floors were bolted to a central pillar running through the center of the building. When the damaged floors failed they fell...straight onto the floor below them, which failed and fell...straight onto the floor below it, and so on.
Anyone who has actually visited the towers knows about this construction feature. It's what allowed the towers to offer completely open floors, unlike other buildings of the time which used the same construction methods from about a century ago where the building had a steel cage frame, meaning each floor was broken up by several columns.
Even ignoring mathematics, physics, chemistry, architecture, engineering, forensics and demolition, just the sheer number of people required to make any of the conspiracy theorists' stories true make it impossible. I mean it's been over a decade and they still have nothing but speculations. There is no proof. They expect us to believe that the US government - that has loses 100s of laptops and mobile phones a year, that has had million of pages of top-secret documents leaked to watchdog sites like Wikileaks - is capable of pulling off such a caper without leaving *any* traces or evidence or people wanting to write tell-all books? Bin Laden was barely dead for a year before 1 SEAL member wrote a tell-all book, and we had a freakin' motion picture made about the decade long operation! Yet....no one has said anything about 9/11? Are you kidding me?!?
According to the official story, the hijackers were armed with box knives.
If I am flying a plane, or have control of something else of similar importance, I am not going to surrender to someone armed with a box knife. Box knives don't scare me that much. I'd fight them.
Also, it is widely know that the Bush Administration received warnings about an impending attack, including a memo from the Phoenix FBI to headquarters, recommending an urgent nationwide review of flight schools "for any information that supports Phoenix's suspicions" of a terrorist connection. The memo reportedly cited Osama bin Laden by name. Bush chose to ignore these warnings.
Some people say that Bush is just grossly incompetent.
Others say that Bush wanted to attack to happen. Not that the US government did the attack themselves, but simply let it happen so that he could have an excuse to attack Iraq. This theory is supported by the great effort that Bush went to trying to link 9/11 to Iraq.
Does it really matter ? All those years ago.! All we need to know as basic is the planes that were hijacked by extreme Islamic Terrorists were flown into the twin towers. Also one into the Pentagon,but the details of that are less clear.
To me its splitting hairs trying to prove the buildings didn't fall in quite the way you would have expected them to do.? Its of zero importance. There was no need to try and make them look worse.
There is going to be enough damage from two planes travelling at 400 MPH,laden with fuel.
PoohBearPenguin is 100% correct.
If you still have to ask if a conspiracy theory is true after more then a decade, it most likely is not. If any of the the 9/11 CT's were true they would have been proved positive by now.
random kids on youtube and internet forums believe 911 was a conspiracy. real experts such as architects and civil engineers fully accept the official story
its hard to believe that a plane can bring down a building vertically like a demolition. the building should have stayed standing. the temperatures the fires cause wasn't near the steel's melting point.
also, that same day, about four people in a van full of explosives (they were trying to blow up the george washington bridge). they were white males. the event was in the news but totally disappeared the next day.
plus look at these pictures from the 9/11 pentagon attack. look at the damages and how the plane was seen coming in.
http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/img...
http://noliesradio.org/archives/3068
there's no way the left side could be perfectly vertical.
something fishy went on that day.
9/11 was real.
I need some Believes of some ppl who think that 911 is a conspiracy or have to say anything about what happened on that day Please give opinions. Anything
