> On 9/11, why did WTC7 fall down so quickly?

On 9/11, why did WTC7 fall down so quickly?

Posted at: 2015-04-20 
James. The question is not asking for a ridiculous explanation how a steel building could possibly collapse due to fire? The question is regarding the free fall? So far no one here who has denied controlled demolition has addressed it.

-Let's get the myths out of the way first:

The NIST (the government. National Institute of Science and technology) document on bld 7 finally released in 2008 says "the collapse of WTC 7 was due primarily to normal office fires" It also says "structural damage from the north tower debris hitting it had little or nothing to do with it's collapse." (if anyone tells you it was due to damage from the North tower hitting it, they are WRONG and/or LYING) A lot of the websites that attempt to "debunk" 9-11 truth, claim the north tower hitting it caused major failure. So that AND the fire led to it's collapse. They are LYING. admitted by NIST.

-Also, A steel building like this does not and can not fall down like a house of cards at near free fall due to one column failure causing a chain reaction as suggested by Faisal Hussain. This is complete scientific quackery.

-Now lets begin- bld 7(was not hit by a plane. Was 610ft, 47 stories, steel. Went straight down symmetrically, primarily into it's own footprint, in 6.5 seconds at complete free fall admitted by the government for the first 2.25 seconds). equivalent of 8 stories or 110ft. at 5:15pm And was down completely in 6.5 seconds, almost complete free fall. And their telling us that fire can completely drop a steel skyscraper like that?



No. The study of the collapse of huge engineered structures under catastrophic conditions requires extremely advanced physics, and it's not like experiments have been carried out to study it. In many ways the collapse of the 3 WTC buildings is a unique event, and the physics of it is not fully understood. Anyone who claims that from the extremely limited data set and understanding of the problem that they can conclude that controlled demolitions the "only" explanation ... is a fool or a liar.

IE, it's not "basic physics."

You also misrepresented both the facts and the NIST report in your question. So basically your question is meaningless.

http://unitedcats.wordpress.com/2012/01/... Etc.

Fire-fighters stated after the atrocity

'Never Trust A Truss'.

And the buildings were constructed with a system of trusses.

See link below.

Once the floor above fell, the one below from the weight falling from above & so on until the building collapsed.

Bit like a house of cards.

I am a person of limited expertise in this area, however my issue is why over 3,000 of their county men did not show up for work on this day, second, watching the collapse of the buildings look so orchestrated, I cant help but see planned demolition in the mix but to think that they had help within our borders is just the unthinkable, but then we did have toy story 2 cowboy sitting in office. The confusion, the craziness of it all baffles me. Those buildings came down with such Precision, those buildings came down in such an orderly manor, I just wish more people would speak on this, I am a native New Yorker, but then we all are since that day, I feel the pain of a nation still today as I am sure you all do.

On Sept 11, 2001, 7 WTC was broken by trash when the encompassing North Framework of the World Trade Center flattened. The trash also captivated shoots, which ongoing to burn throughout manufactured on lower surfaces of the developing. The structure's inner fire withdrawal system was missing water pressure to fight the shoots, and the developing flattened completely at 5:21:10 pm.[1] The failing began when a critical inner pillar secured and activated architectural failing throughout, which was first noticeable from the external with the failing of a beach penthouse structure at 5:20:33 pm.

They probably intended to fly another plane into that building but it did not happen for some reason, and tower 7 was already wired for demolition, so they brought it down. In fact, the man in charge of the building said on tv that they decided to "pull it".

Why did it fall down at all is what i'd like to know, considering the planes flew into WTC 1 & 2. Well, I know what happened but it's the rest of you I worry about. All this hatred toward muslims and support for illegal wars, it can only end in disaster

Many factors are there and the supports which had fire protection failed. The extreme heat of the fire another. It was not planned for an airplane to crash into it but it did happen.Sad indeed butthey are still finding many answers.

wtc7 was hit by the over pressure from the collapse of wtc1 and 2... this wall of pressure was accompanied by the Impact of the debris from both buildings

Because that was the intention. A very well organized plan carried out to perfection.

Even NIST admit WTC7 was in free fall for over 2 seconds, so how can all that steel structure suddenly disappear - as required for the free fall collapse? Office fires do not make vertical steel columns suddenly disappear, so Is controlled demolition the only explanation?

a plane crashed into a buliding thats what happened

you answered your own question.