> Maddie mccann do you think if the parents?

Maddie mccann do you think if the parents?

Posted at: 2015-04-20 
yes , it certainly raised the suspicion that they had something to hide

i think that the fact that they stated that leaving three children alone whilst they went out to 'eat' was well within the boundaries of good parenting also did them no favours

jesus , i would love to know their definition of neglect

ask yourself

Why would a doting family, who miss their daughter more than words, be so uncooperative and so difficult when it comes to finding her.

Did they go back to Portugal? Nope

Did they panic with worry the next day? No they played Tennis

Did they have enough money to hire a babysitter? Yep

Any sign of forced entry? Nope

Did the dogs detect Madeleines dna in the car? Yep

Have the dogs been wrong? Nope

Did Kate confess to a priest? Yes she did.. and they can't tell us what she said

Here's a question from me. I see nothing being done with their 'foundation'. There were rumors that they were using donations to pay off their mortgage!

I dread to think what that poor little girl was put through. She was described as the perfect child, yet she would cry and scream and not sleep at night. She screamed all the nights kate and gerry were out and she even asked why her mummy didn't come for her. No response. Kate even asked her relatives if they could care for her the year previous to her disappearance.

I honestly think that Kate couldn't cope. I don't think she wouldve harmed Madeleine but I think her husband did and it's destroying her. He may hold this over her 'I did it for us' kinda thing.

Gerry was also seen taking a 'faulty fridge' to a tip MILES away from the resort, shortly before Maddie 'disappeared'.

When police got a tip that Maddie may be in the north of the island, Kate rings them and says she had a dream that Maddie was in the SOUTH of the island. Hmm...

Just to stir things up, the peodophile behind the Holly Greig case was staying close to the Mccanns..

Either way she weren't kidnapped. Police dogs don't lie.

Also, they acted very oddly when they were told that the British police dogs had found the scent of death and blood spots in the apartment, and the smell of death on Kate's clothes and on the pink toy Cuddlecat.

Instead of being upset that their daughter had come to harm, perhaps killed by an intruder, they tried to say the dogs were "unreliable". They now don't want the dogs mentioned in any reports.

I agree with you. Along with a whole list of what this complicit pair did that does not add up. Question why the Vatican removed them from their web site. It was after the priest divulged to his Cardinal what he had been told by Kate at Confession. A devout catholic, yeah OK.

As for the book, anyone can write a load of crap to deflect the finger of blame away from them.

The parents come across as a very shady duo with much to hide !

Yes, but they chose to try to say that they were suddenly being "set up" and ran away obstructing the enquiry.

I believe the PJ had tried to eliminate all other possibilities before questioning the parents as arguido's, that they were under immense political pressure to do so, I believe that they did eliminate the majority of the hypotheses put forward before officially interviewing the "parents", who then refused to answer anything and got back to England as quickly as possible, after alerting SKY News of course...

I get fed up suggesting people who are concerned pick up Kates book from the library. Everything is answered in that. Why not humour me and read it? I can remember the pressure they were under at the time. Hope this helps.

had answered the 48questions put to them by police and taken part in a reconstruction that people would be more willing to believe the abduction story? esp as they said they would do anything to help.

Most people think by not anwering the questions or doing the reconstruction they had something to hide.

thoughts please