@john...I like how you combine fact and fiction to sound plausible.WHAT DOES SHARON HAVE TO DO WITH KENNEDY DEATH?? 0 O A BIG FAT GOOSE EGG...ZERO...NILTCH NADA...NEIN...NOWAY..
@mark..you are too stubborn to keep an open mind ,you are sealed..not open to seeing all sides of the complex equation of how to kill a president and get away with it...ever play chess mark?? I doubt it..they stayed one step ahead always with jfk murder...one step ahead,,with pawns killed off...and a king killed with out you seeing it....one step ahead...a pawn put him in check....the rest gave him nowhere to go...
@chris...you are correct...BUT by saying hidden is really killed or DEAD END. you are correct in your assumption of "OFTEN THE ANSWER IS RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU" When you watch zapruder film, "YOU CANT SEE THE GUNS FOR ALL THE CAMERAS".....
LIFE MAG PAID 150,000 TO ZAPRUDER FOR KILLING JFK. HE USED A GUN DISGUISED AS A CAMERA. MOORMAN SHOOTS JFK IN THE BACK OF THE HEAD A SPLIT SEC BEFORE ZAPRUDER SHOOTS JFK WITH A SIDE FRONT TEMPLE SHOT...THERE WERE NUMEROUS ASSASSINS THERE THAT HIT KENNEDY BUT ZAPRUDER ALSO GOT TECHNICAL KILL SHOT WHICH NETTED HIM A BONUS 25000..
Mr Kennedy's death has been remorselessly examined and scrutinised by every possible investigator, from the Media, to national Intelligence Services of various countries. The overwhelming conclusion is that Lee Oswald acted alone for reasons known only to himself. There is simply no evidence at all implicating anyone els.
What generates all the speculation about the JFK killing is the same thing that generates speculation about the Sharon Tate murder, there seemed to be no motive at all for the killings. It is possible Oswald was avenging JFKs war on Cuba, and that Manson wildly overreacted to some perceived snub by tragic Sharon, but we will never know. Oswald is dead and Manson never gives an coherent answer to any question.
1 year before his assassination he declined an Operation called Operations North woods (this is real and proven just Google it) which would be a plan where they frame cuba for terrorist attacks in the USA by making a fake explosion and then blaming it on CUBA so that they would be able to invade cuba, Jfk did not want this too happen because he was a good man and believe in values and morals!
You can't trust the government or mainstream media now days
Not been an American,and it been so long ago and of zero interest to modern people I prefer to accept the official story. Why rake it all over when most of the characters in it are dead anyway. It was a great tragedy at the time.I was 18 and well remember it,but they had a new President in hours and we must move on.
It is easy to rant to make political points, and to speculate without data, but there is no evidence for any of these conspiracy theories (unless it has been very well hidden, and I am certainly not going to speculate about that!).
Often the obvious answer is the right one.
There is only one plausible hypothesis that fits the available evidence and that is for LHO acting alone. Take you pick of the more than 300 conspiracy theories that have been put forward. They all fail for reasons that are not too hard to pick out.
As you can see, you have quite a variety of fruitcake theories (not to mention nut jobs) to choose from in the Who Killed Kennedy? buffet. Take your pick. Watch out, though - some of them are pretty tough to swallow.
You're correct, people have different opinions.
Well, people let's believe that Lee Harvey Oswald was the murderer of the president Kennedy!
Despite , some people still believe that he was not the killer or he did not act alone.
Let's believe he acted alone and there was no one to assist him.
But there are a number of conspiracy theories. Some people say/believe that (CIA,FBI, or Russia, Cuba and etc.... were involved in the president's assassination.
My question is , what are the evidence that disprove and discredit these these intelligent agencies ?
I'd appreciate if you could at least provide me 2 dot points for each of them!
