yes, of course. They cannot name one individual involved, they use generalities "the government" Wouldn't you think that of the over 2,000 families of the victims that these "proofers" could produce one individual involved and present the evidence and convict them in a civil wrongful death suit so that a family of one of the victims can at least get financial justice. Go to a 911 ceremonies, these whack jobs hang around the outer fringes spewing their nonsense and when confronted to go and confront the families, fireman, police gathered at the ceremony they won't dare to. When you ask them to produce the name of one individual responsible for giving directions they can not, they accuse the fire department as being involved but will not confront them, they say the fire department wasn't directly involved but following orders but can't name the person giving the orders let alone bring evidence forward that would lead to that persons conviction in a criminal or civil court, Remember the burden of proof is even less in civil court to convict.
Delusional or f***ing morons - their choice.
It's been over a decade and they still cannot present anything more than flimsy innuendo, or "conclusions" based on outright faulty science.
For most of their theories to be correct, essentially all the victims who were killed on 9/11 would have had to have been "in on it." That also means their families would probably have been "in on it" as well, not to mention the local police, fire crews, the mayor, the air force (if not the entire US military) large chunks of local, state, and federal government... But despite the estimated tens of thousands of people involved, all of them have been airtight for the past decade. No slip of the lips. No nosy news reporters (because they're all in on it too, right?) No lost memos or misplaced laptops with incriminating evidence (do you know how many phones and laptops the US government misplaces every day?) Nope. Nothing. Apparently humans are capable of keeping perfect secrets despite what 1000s of years of history says otherwise.
"There is no evidence for a conspiracy whatsoever.
IT WAS A TERROR ATTACK BY MUSLIMS!"
Now THAT'S delusional.
Wake up buddy
Some are but that isn't the real problem.
People become CT's because they can not think. They can not apply the processes of logic and reason that are required to examine multiple pieces of evidence, determine which are relevant and which are not, fit the relevant bits together then form a conclusion based on what the evidence says. Because they can not think they are attracted to CT's where the conclusion is arrived at first, then evidence that seems to fit is collected, anything else being ignored.
Either delusional or they are smoking too much legal weed.
Calling them "delusional" would be a polite way of saying it.
In my view yes they are. They are just like delusional Harry/Hermione shippers.
There is no evidence for a conspiracy whatsoever.
IT WAS A TERROR ATTACK BY MUSLIMS!
So stop the b*llsh*t.
Thank you.
