> Question regarding 9/11?

Question regarding 9/11?

Posted at: 2015-04-20 
with 9/11, why is it when you watch mainstream media- all they focus on is the twin towers, and not the pentagon and all the other places which were affected by 9/11?

There is just too much evidence now that suggests an inside job: the fact that all THE WRECKAGE WAS SHIPPED ABROAD as soon as possible, the fact that even ROLLS ROYCE themselves have said that the engine recovered were not the type of engine used on the type of plane (b757) that was said to be responsible. The fact that most of the 'hijackers' are still alive: http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLE... the fact that no jets were scrambled in time; that no significant plane debris was found at the pentagon site (planes do not vaporize!); that the buildings seem to be demolished, especially building 7; that jet fuel cannot melt steel, even though molten steel was seen "flowing like lava"; that the first responders heard explosions in the basement and within the buildings before they collapsed etc...

-WTC leaseholder Larry Silverstein admitted that building 7 was pulled down by a controlled demolition:



It my personal belief that they focus on the twin towers instead of the pentagon for one of two reasons.

1: They believe the deaths of a large amount of innocent people are more important to be watched.

or

2: Probably because they don't want everyone realizing how week the pentagon was to stop that incoming tragedy at a subconscious level.

While your characterization is not entirely true (since yesterday I have watched 2 documantaries on the Pentagon and one on Flight 93 for example) the majority of loss of life was at the World Trade Center complex and 10 buildings were ultimately destroyed or damaged beyond repair. It is only natural that because the lions share of the destruction was in New York it would get the lions share of attention.

I would just like to say to Mark F, if 9/11 was a terrorist attack then you would literally have to break physics and chemistry. Enough said

There is just too much evidence now that proves 9/11 was NOT an inside job:

*ALL the wreckage from the WTC was all collected and carefully examined before those pieces not pertinent to the investigation were sold for scrap. Critical pieces are still in storage at JFK while quite a lot of it is on public display in many places right here in the U.S.

*The airlines and their insurers all admit it was their aircraft that were hijacked. ROLLS ROYCE have never said that the engines recovered were not the type of engine used on the hijacked planes and no one has ever produced such a statement.

*None of the hijackers are still alive. If they were why has no one bothered to interview any of them in the last 12 years.

*Massive amounts of aircraft debris was found at the pentagon site, as well as the DNA from all the passengers and crew and many of their personal effects and of course the Flight Data Recorder from the plane. http://therightbloggerbastard.blogspot.c...

*No where does the "the official story" ever claim that jet fuel melted steel.

*No evidence for alleged pools of molten steel has ever been produced nor can anyone explain what it would mean if it did exist.

*Some first responders heard things they described as "like explosions". None however reported BOMBS. There is a difference.

*WTC leaseholder Larry Silverstein admitted on national TV he asked the FDNY to pull rescuers out of harms way around the badly damaged and in danger of collapse 7 World Trade Center to save lives. He has never deviated from that story. Any other interpretation is utterly moronic. The FDNY is not in the building demolition business.

*During the collapses of the Twin Towers floors became detached from the inner and outer cores, which were incapable of standing on their own, explaining why they remained standing only for moments before collapse.

*No evidence has ever been produced showing smoke coming from the basement seconds before the planes hit.

*Only one person is on record as claiming he heard explosions in the basement before a plane hit but he changes his story more than most people change their underwear. People were injured in the basement due to the blasts from the plane impacts travelling down elevator shafts.

*Pictures taken weeks after the towers fell show steel girders with diagonal cuts in the them - cuts made by workers using Thermal Lances to clear debris.

*Designers of the WTC have never claimed they were built to withstand MULTIPLE impacts from aircraft. They were not even DESIGNED to survive one. Primitive theoretical models done in 1964 suggested they should survive one impact but the model tested a scenario with 5 to 7 times less impact energy than experienced on 9/11 and did not examine the effect of fire.

*Nowhere in the "official version" does it state the plane that hit the pentagon 'vaporized'. The Pentagon was not lightly damaged but heavily damaged with a repair bill of $500 million.

*No hijacker passports were found in the rubble at the WTC. 4 hijacker passports were recovered, 2 in Shanksville and 2 in NYC that had been ejected from the planes at impact along with hundreds of other artifacts and personal effects. Small, light personal items routinely survive aircraft crashes. As evidence the passports were useless so there was no reason to plant it.

* Of 85 video's taken into evidence the only security camera footage taken at or around the Pentagon that showed the impact of Flight 77 was released in 2006 after being presented by the prosecution in the Moussawi trial. Some of the other tapes did not even come from Washington DC. One for example was from a Kinko's in Florida.

*Colonel George Nelson (USAF ret.) is a crackpot who is not taken seriously by anyone outside the tiny 9/11 truther community and had no access to the crash site or evidence at the Pentagon and thus is in no position to speak on what happened there. In 2006 he stated there was enough evidence of an inside job to present to a Grand Jury. So why hasn't he? What is he waiting for? http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/29401...

I think it has to do with more deaths. I've done a lot of research on it because its my birthday... Honestly I don't know for sure, I've noicticed that too

you are wrong because most of the shows over the years have been about Flight 93, which landed in the middle of Pennsylvania.

It was a inside job, look all the evidence, even osama bin laden immediatly went out of his way to say he was not involved right after the incident.

Illuminati (best. answer. EVER!!!)

with 9/11, why is it when you watch mainstream media- all they focus on is the twin towers, and not the pentagon and all the other places which were affected by 9/11?